From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fac41,b87849933931bc93
X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,b87849933931bc93
X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b87849933931bc93
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: f43e6,b87849933931bc93
X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public
X-Google-Thread: 114809,b87849933931bc93
X-Google-Attributes: gid114809,public
X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,b87849933931bc93
X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public
From: ell@access2.digex.net (Ell)
Subject: Re: What is wrong with OO ?
Date: 1997/01/03
Message-ID: <5ahqo6$gk6@news4.digex.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 207382905
organization: The Universe
followup-to: 
 comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.smalltalk,comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.ada,comp.object,comp.software-eng
newsgroups: 
 comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.smalltalk,comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.ada,comp.object,comp.software-eng
Date: 1997-01-03T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Ian Joyner (i.joyner@acm.org) wrote:
: Ell wrote:
: > 
: > Ian Joyner (i.joyner@acm.org) wrote:
: > : And people can still drive model T Fords, and fly WWI planes.
 
Ell
: > I find the key aspects of C++ to be within the parameters of the
: > _progressive_ OO paradigm and practice.  In many ways C++ has led and
: > still leads in the expression and implementation of many significantly
: > useful OO concepts.
 
Ell
<<< Led (first or second) wrt the OO paradigm: Private data members,
static resolution of overloaded functions, protected members, and multiple
inheritance. Correct me if I'm wrong.  Remember this is wrt the early
'80's.>>>

: 1) C++ has added nothing new that has not been pioneered elsewhere.
: (Classes from Simula, multiple inheritance, genericty were all
: around before C++ adopted them)

You only addressed one of my points (MI) and would you please tell me
which OOPLs had MI before C++.

Elliott