From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,2901996ead8d0ecd X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Received: by 10.68.235.173 with SMTP id un13mr215543pbc.3.1360421301980; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 06:48:21 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.50.163.67 with SMTP id yg3mr286131igb.12.1360421301735; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 06:48:21 -0800 (PST) Path: mj10ni9pbb.1!nntp.google.com!c4no399063pbz.1!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2013 06:48:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=173.228.52.174; posting-account=Qh2kiQoAAADpCLlhT_KTYoGO8dU3n4I6 NNTP-Posting-Host: 173.228.52.174 References: User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <5af5e07a-5caa-437d-af7d-a73fcbdd8541@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Assertion_Policy implementation regarding Aspect Features From: Anh Vo Injection-Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2013 14:48:21 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Date: 2013-02-09T06:48:20-08:00 List-Id: On Saturday, February 9, 2013 2:24:41 AM UTC-8, Simon Wright wrote: > Anh Vo writes: > > > > This inspires me to learn this feature a little bit deeper. I would > > > like to know if GNAT comply with ARM by showing the following > > > scenarios. > > On the other hand, the fact that your predicate isn't disabled by pragma > > Assertion_Policy (Ignore) may be a failure to comply with the second > > sentence of ARM 11.4.2(10)[1]: > Thank you for your analysis. It does not make sense to comply with pragma Assertion_Policy thru compiler option.