From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,494ac732c5488b7f
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!q39g2000prh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Marco <prenom_nomus@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: SPARK: What does it prove?
Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 07:42:44 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <5ae67ca0-91cf-46d1-9f4c-aa1ac442ee77@q39g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
References: <4bffc379$0$2374$4d3efbfe@news.sover.net>
 <80ef9ed5-fd1b-4f41-8df9-b74b690444be@y21g2000vba.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.103.209.192
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1275144164 10723 127.0.0.1 (29 May 2010 14:42:44
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 14:42:44 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: q39g2000prh.googlegroups.com; posting-host=65.103.209.192;
	posting-account=WITAxQkAAAAHjnLda9Lofpqp8mERTWL4
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2.3)
	Gecko/20100401 Firefox/3.6.3,gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:12145
Date: 2010-05-29T07:42:44-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On May 28, 6:55=A0am, Rod Chapman <roderick.chap...@googlemail.com>
wrote:
>
> PS...if the SPARK traffic here really does get annoyingly high,
> then perhaps we should create comp.lang.ada.spark?

 No - I enjoy the SPARK threads even though I am not using it (yet).
 Traffic volume on this group is light and respectful.