From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,e7151167e0767ecc X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews2.google.com!not-for-mail From: wojtek@power.com.pl (Wojtek Narczynski) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Feasibility of using Ada in new development Date: 6 Sep 2004 10:56:41 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <5ad0dd8a.0409060956.7fe744f6@posting.google.com> References: <8429999a.0408231027.2850e800@posting.google.com> <5ad0dd8a.0408302222.56282d6f@posting.google.com> <4135498c_1@news.tm.net.my> <5ad0dd8a.0409040738.3fff41b8@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 83.27.46.212 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1094493402 32260 127.0.0.1 (6 Sep 2004 17:56:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2004 17:56:42 +0000 (UTC) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3393 Date: 2004-09-06T10:56:41-07:00 List-Id: Pascal Obry wrote in message news:... >> - For a web e-commerce site I'd use WebObjects (now Java, but I >> prefered it in Obj-C), because it will be the quickest to develop. > > I'll use AWS, quite simpler and way quickest to develop with it. Because you know WebObjects, and don't like it, or because you only know AWS? > Why modify the GNAT runtime. This is a library right ? Ada with tasks, > protected object is certainly in a good position to propose something. I reason that you have not looked at the material under the links I sent. While Ada tasks and protected objects provide convenient semantics, their GNAT implementation with task = os level thread does not yield desired performance under certain applications. In this situation for C there are libraries of cooperative threads with resource aware scheduling, for Ada there isn't anything comparable. More info in other posts. > Maybe starting with AWS is a good idea... Can it scale to > 100K socket connections? Regards, Wojtek