From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,e7151167e0767ecc X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews2.google.com!not-for-mail From: wojtek@power.com.pl (Wojtek Narczynski) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: State Threads Date: 6 Sep 2004 06:15:55 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <5ad0dd8a.0409060515.4b17e2ed@posting.google.com> References: <8429999a.0408231027.2850e800@posting.google.com> <5ad0dd8a.0408302222.56282d6f@posting.google.com> <4135498c_1@news.tm.net.my> <5ad0dd8a.0409040738.3fff41b8@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.111.211.178 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1094476556 18716 127.0.0.1 (6 Sep 2004 13:15:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2004 13:15:56 +0000 (UTC) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3377 Date: 2004-09-06T06:15:55-07:00 List-Id: Marius Amado Alves wrote in message news:... >> ... but what if it allows hundreds of thousands of people to each >> use one server instead of two? That would be one instead of ten, or ten instead of one hundred, for the application that our company is looking at writing. > Ok, it's probably a market perception issue. I don't feel a market for > State Threads, one that compensates the effort and anyhow. And the risk. > That's all I meant by "waste of time." But I'm may be wrong of course. > If you believe there's a market for 100_000 copies of State Thread go > for it. I am not sure what you mean by "market for State Threads", as they are already available free in at least three incarnations (SGI, GNU Pth, Capriccio). But there definitely is a market for very high performance internet servers (Zeus, Stalker, Lyris - to name just three successful companies). At first sight Ada seems a perfect choice for very high performance software, but when I looked closely, the results were disappointing. Also disappointing is the NIH syndrome that prevails the Ada world. Regards, Wojtek