From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,9d303864ae4c70ad X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-04-16 12:28:10 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: wojtek@power.com.pl (Wojtek Narczynski) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Reprise: 'in out' parameters for functions Date: 16 Apr 2004 12:28:10 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <5ad0dd8a.0404161128.4657af2b@posting.google.com> References: <5ad0dd8a.0404090512.15af2908@posting.google.com> <5ad0dd8a.0404091828.6e79bb4e@posting.google.com> <8Oadneu6eY9pweDdRVn-hA@comcast.com> <5ad0dd8a.0404151752.4f598e1a@posting.google.com> <5ad0dd8a.0404160338.5a1c9116@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 83.27.43.192 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1082143690 10296 127.0.0.1 (16 Apr 2004 19:28:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 19:28:10 +0000 (UTC) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:7223 Date: 2004-04-16T12:28:10-07:00 List-Id: Hello, > I found no examples of data structures with lock granularity lower > than the whole data structure. ...lock granularity higher than... Sorry, Wojtek