From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,9d303864ae4c70ad X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-04-16 12:25:04 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: wojtek@power.com.pl (Wojtek Narczynski) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Reprise: 'in out' parameters for functions Date: 16 Apr 2004 12:25:04 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <5ad0dd8a.0404161125.73caabc6@posting.google.com> References: <5ad0dd8a.0404130130.66d5e721@posting.google.com> <5ad0dd8a.0404131441.20b8a942@posting.google.com> <5ad0dd8a.0404140703.49e1e2f2@posting.google.com> <5ad0dd8a.0404151629.5e270f63@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 83.27.43.192 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1082143504 9987 127.0.0.1 (16 Apr 2004 19:25:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 19:25:04 +0000 (UTC) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:7222 Date: 2004-04-16T12:25:04-07:00 List-Id: Dimitry, > Does it mean that 1.a) there is a better approach, or that 1.b) parallel > applications are hard to develop? I would definitely disagree with the > first and agree with the second. Clearly parallel applications extremely hard to develop. Regarding better approach (than protected for highly concurrent data structures). It depends on what "better" means in a given context. For example, there are more time and space efficient, allowing higher concurrency, approaches. Regards, Wojtek