From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b2376c6535c5da80,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-02-16 08:37:22 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: wojtek@power.com.pl (Wojtek Narczynski)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Peer review organization
Date: 16 Feb 2004 08:37:22 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <5ad0dd8a.0402160837.6f11d687@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 83.27.22.51
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1076949442 31999 127.0.0.1 (16 Feb 2004 16:37:22
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 16:37:22 +0000 (UTC)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:5603
Date: 2004-02-16T08:37:22-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Hello,

May I ask: what organizational methods do you use to perform peer
reviews? Do you have a very clever SCM, change seats, track changed
files in a textual list by hand, use unifed diffs? Or something
entirely else?

Regards,
Wojtek