From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,a00006d3c4735d70 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-01-29 04:22:55 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: wojtek@power.com.pl (Wojtek Narczynski) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: In-Out Parameters for functions Date: 29 Jan 2004 04:22:55 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <5ad0dd8a.0401290422.23e3e059@posting.google.com> References: <5ad0dd8a.0401240721.7682f2e1@posting.google.com> <5ad0dd8a.0401280230.5c800894@posting.google.com> <101ggi3sdf56311@corp.supernews.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.111.211.178 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1075378975 27879 127.0.0.1 (29 Jan 2004 12:22:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 12:22:55 +0000 (UTC) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:5038 Date: 2004-01-29T04:22:55-08:00 List-Id: Hello, > Which goes to show that even bright people can be wrong from time-to-time. > :-) It is not a problem, as long as they are able to admit it. > This topic is almost a religious war. Too bad... > I'm one of the few who's changed sides (even though allowing 'in out' on > functions would be such a disruptive change to Janus/Ada that it probably > would lead to the abandonment of the technology), (...) Sounds hard to believe, but as I look at your email, I believe you. How about you add 'return' and 'access' to procedures instead? (Probably a silly question) Regards, Wojtek