From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
X-Google-Thread: 103376,f3437064e1091fec
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-07-12 05:30:41 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: wojtek@power.com.pl (Wojtek Narczynski)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: What evil would happen?
Date: 12 Jul 2003 05:30:40 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Message-ID: <5ad0dd8a.0307120430.56d11616@posting.google.com>
References: <5ad0dd8a.0307111151.4a08f95a@posting.google.com>
 <1057954025.510093@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 212.160.20.107
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1058013041 1617 127.0.0.1 (12 Jul 2003 12:30:41
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 12 Jul 2003 12:30:41 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:40227
Date: 2003-07-12T12:30:41+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com> wrote in message news:<1057954025.510093@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>...
����
>(...) - can you make a generic function
> with generic parameters which correspond to the out
> parameters that you would like to pass into the
> function, and have the function write to those? If
> so, is that an acceptable workaround?

I have tried it and the compiler told me "left hand side of assignment
must be a variable".

Regards,
Wojtek