From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,1592759aa83d0d45
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-28 06:07:17 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: wojtek@power.com.pl (Wojtek Narczynski)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Suggestion for Ada 200x - Interface inheritance
Date: 28 May 2003 06:07:16 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Message-ID: <5ad0dd8a.0305280507.57bd5a16@posting.google.com>
References: <0Pxza.699607$OV.652508@rwcrnsc54>
 <5ad0dd8a.0305240435.337d9373@posting.google.com>
 <wccznlcm226.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <5ad0dd8a.0305250612.ec54c23@posting.google.com> <3ED1039F.7010001@spam.com>
 <iYWdna3UTaIzkkyjXTWcoA@gbronline.com>
 <719Aa.14547$fT5.3595@nwrdny01.gnilink.net>
 <5ad0dd8a.0305252353.44adf560@posting.google.com>
 <PIqAa.18136$fT5.13411@nwrdny01.gnilink.net>
 <5ad0dd8a.0305271041.25ca7120@posting.google.com>
 <1054062833.558791@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.111.211.178
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1054127236 9883 127.0.0.1 (28 May 2003 13:07:16
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 28 May 2003 13:07:16 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:37904
Date: 2003-05-28T13:07:16+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com> wrote in message news:<1054062833.558791@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>...
> Wojtek Narczynski wrote:
> > But the situation where you cannot rely on the compiler to check
> > wether you did not forget to put an exception handler in isn't good
> > either.
> 
> Yes it is.

So it's good to have the compiler check types and ranges, but it's not
good to check exception propagation patterns. All clear, thank you.