From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b8965337cd786e8b X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-02-10 09:09:19 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: wojtek@power.com.pl (Wojtek Narczynski) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada95 in business (database) software Date: 10 Feb 2003 09:09:19 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <5ad0dd8a.0302100909.51cb0d96@posting.google.com> References: <3E45EE04.280EC800@verizon.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 80.55.195.178 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1044896959 14794 127.0.0.1 (10 Feb 2003 17:09:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 10 Feb 2003 17:09:19 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:33962 Date: 2003-02-10T17:09:19+00:00 List-Id: Mark Wallace wrote in message news:<3E45EE04.280EC800@verizon.net>... > Is anyone using Ada95 for database-oriented business applications? Does > either of the principal commercial compilers (Aonix, GNAT) have a decent > (i.e., better than ODBC) interface to Oracle? Oracle 7 used to have an Ada precompiler PRO*Ada. Now there is this SQL*Module beast. Looks good, but I haven't tested it yet. Regards, Wojtek