From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,6d748e86b56b1269
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-01-29 03:30:30 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: wojtek@power.com.pl (Wojtek Narczynski)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Prefix to 'ACCESS must either statically match... But why?
Date: 29 Jan 2003 03:30:30 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Message-ID: <5ad0dd8a.0301290330.ec541a4@posting.google.com>
References: <mailman.7.1043823456.30820.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 212.160.20.107
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1043839830 17334 127.0.0.1 (29 Jan 2003 11:30:30
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 29 Jan 2003 11:30:30 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:33549
Date: 2003-01-29T11:30:30+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Grein, Christoph" <christoph.grein@eurocopter.com> wrote in message news:<mailman.7.1043823456.30820.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>...

> I'm not so sure that this is possible in general. Note that the slice 
> boundaries need no lie on storage unit boundaries.

The same is true for, say, a packed array of three boolean elements.
AFAIK Pragma Pack excludes the eligibility of aliased for element. Or
opposite - aliased element of Pragma Pack.

GNAT supports access to array slices with 'Unrestricted_Access, It
will be an interesting experiment to check how it behaves on
sub-storage unit ranges.

Regards,
Wojtek