From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fac41,b87849933931bc93
X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,b87849933931bc93
X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public
X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,b87849933931bc93
X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public
X-Google-Thread: 114809,b87849933931bc93
X-Google-Attributes: gid114809,public
X-Google-Thread: f43e6,b87849933931bc93
X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b87849933931bc93
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: ell@access1.digex.net (Ell)
Subject: Re: What is wrong with OO ?
Date: 1997/01/01
Message-ID: <5acivg$5uj@news3.digex.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 207040704
organization: The Universe
followup-to: 
 comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.smalltalk,comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.ada,comp.object,comp.software-eng
newsgroups: 
 comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.smalltalk,comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.ada,comp.object,comp.software-eng
Date: 1997-01-01T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Bob Jarvis (nospam@thankyou.net) wrote:
: As I recall it, the Von Neumann architecture's principal differentiating
: point from
: others was that in the VN scheme there is only a single memory space; both
: instructions and data were/are resident in the same memory, and instructions
: could be manipulated using the same instructions that are used to manipulate
: data.  In the principle alternative architecture (i.e. the only one I can 
: remember :),
: known as the Harvard architecture, two completely separate memory spaces
: are maintained - one for instructions and another for data.

These are my understanding of the concepts also.  The correct definition
of Von Neuman architecture here is related to but different from how most
others in this thread are defining it. 

Elliott