From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.236.38.36 with SMTP id z24mr612281yha.8.1418888011013; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 23:33:31 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.140.48.69 with SMTP id n63mr7241qga.21.1418888010995; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 23:33:30 -0800 (PST) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!i13no102066qae.0!news-out.google.com!r1ni70qat.1!nntp.google.com!i13no102062qae.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 23:33:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=197.87.225.175; posting-account=r0RePAgAAABkc8iAou09Mtfbf-fnKQql NNTP-Posting-Host: 197.87.225.175 References: <1a2fea61-bcc1-43a9-b6e3-edf474308402@googlegroups.com> <021184f0-18ef-40bc-ba62-fd307998fe1c@googlegroups.com> <793614d3-4219-4cca-9078-24a5d50c6ef5@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <5aa20320-bea2-4c57-979e-a403f30f7cdb@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Ada Connections to this Crypto. From: MM Injection-Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 07:33:31 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Received-Bytes: 2013 X-Received-Body-CRC: 622544353 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:24095 Date: 2014-12-17T23:33:30-08:00 List-Id: On Thursday, 18 December 2014 03:08:05 UTC+2, Denis McMahon wrote: > I'm still waiting for him to demonstrate, rather than theorise, the > "inherent fallibility of binary based cryptosystems to attack". Don't hold your breath. > I paraphrase his comments, I hope I present the idea of what he keeps > saying fairly accurately. No more inaccurately than anyone else. He contradicts himself so often that it is nearly impossible to understand what he really means most of the time. The best you'll manage is a sort of general overview where his most blatant ideas remain unchangeable, but the details are somewhere between completely mutable and opaque. M --