From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,4f40de4bb311cbe6
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-07-16 11:19:45 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: anh_vo@udlp.com (Anh_Vo)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Gnat Bug detected?
Date: 16 Jul 2003 11:19:44 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Message-ID: <5a59d6a9.0307161019.53b51885@posting.google.com>
References: <bf3i44$f4n@news.Informatik.Uni-Oldenburg.DE>
 <3F1560EA.FD75ABAF@raytheon.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.168.132.74
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1058379585 6850 127.0.0.1 (16 Jul 2003 18:19:45
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 16 Jul 2003 18:19:45 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:40350
Date: 2003-07-16T18:19:45+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Mark Johnson <mark_h_johnson@raytheon.com> wrote in message news:<3F1560EA.FD75ABAF@raytheon.com>...
> Timo Warns wrote:
> > 
> > Can someone confirm following bug?
> > [snip]
> I get it as well w/ GNAT 5.01w (a May 8 wavefront). Based on that
> result, I doubt it is fixed in 3.16a1 (last customer release) but it
> will take a while before I have time to test it. I suggest a message to
> ACT is in order.
>   --Mark

It compiled OK with GNAT-5.00a under Windows 2K.

A. Vo