From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,d60e0492375aa57a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-07-31 10:43:15 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: anh_vo@udlp.com (Anh_Vo) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Visibility of private packages?? Date: 31 Jul 2002 10:43:15 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <5a59d6a9.0207310943.6d043680@posting.google.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.168.132.64 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1028137395 3954 127.0.0.1 (31 Jul 2002 17:43:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 31 Jul 2002 17:43:15 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:27526 Date: 2002-07-31T17:43:15+00:00 List-Id: Just change private package A.B1.C1 to private package A.B3. A.B2 body can with A.B3 package. Thus, the desired effect is achieved. "Peter Coventry" wrote in message news:... > ... > Does this mean that if A.B1.C1 is private, it can only be withed by the > bodies of A.B1 and other descendants of A.B1, and specs of private packages > of descendants of A.B1? > > If this is the case, how could I structure things to give the desired > effect? > > Thanks.