From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on
	ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_20,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1
X-Received: by 2002:aed:232d:: with SMTP id h42mr11890089qtc.143.1610719010236;
        Fri, 15 Jan 2021 05:56:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:7449:: with SMTP id p70mr17109401ybc.363.1610719010021;
 Fri, 15 Jan 2021 05:56:50 -0800 (PST)
Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.gegeweb.eu!gegeweb.org!usenet-fr.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 05:56:49 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <rtrve9$7qa$1@dont-email.me>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=20.133.0.13; posting-account=YRfoYAoAAADhSEO2nLYx10QUUvp8akYl
NNTP-Posting-Host: 20.133.0.13
References: <1cc09f04-98f2-4ef3-ac84-9a9ca5aa3fd5n@googlegroups.com>
 <c0409256-1edd-4a06-8243-7120ea38b632n@googlegroups.com> <fbe75221-b91c-4d98-b537-61f6b33acae6n@googlegroups.com>
 <rtrve9$7qa$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <5a249a9a-0b16-431d-8530-3962b25b6498n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Lower bounds of Strings
From: Stephen Davies <joviangm@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 13:56:50 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:61141
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Friday, 15 January 2021 at 11:48:27 UTC, Jeffrey R. Carter wrote:
> type String_Base is array (Positive range <>) of Character; 
> subtype String is String_Base (Positive range 1 .. <>); 

I wish it had been this way since the beginning. That way, in those
rare instances where code is really using the variable lower-bound,
the use of String_Base would the intention clear. Alas, making that
change now would break that code.