From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.66.172.79 with SMTP id ba15mr2270757pac.26.1385042708581;
        Thu, 21 Nov 2013 06:05:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.50.3.70 with SMTP id a6mr767301iga.16.1385042708461; Thu, 21
 Nov 2013 06:05:08 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!i10no23895pba.1!news-out.google.com!9ni895qaf.0!nntp.google.com!i2no639062qav.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 06:05:08 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <riret6e8flom.1hq7lgea7g9ep.dlg@40tude.net>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=180.24.171.58;
 posting-account=Mi71UQoAAACnFhXo1NVxPlurinchtkIj
NNTP-Posting-Host: 180.24.171.58
References: <f04108fb-f007-44ec-8f9c-9d6772070606@googlegroups.com>
 <523174ae-c1fc-40e0-a940-12f1665fa2fc@googlegroups.com>
 <d6c49c80-b4bd-4ff3-bdb4-8e289639a6bb@googlegroups.com>
 <riret6e8flom.1hq7lgea7g9ep.dlg@40tude.net>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <5a1508ca-f231-429f-b06e-b418be03d208@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Strange instantiation error with formal packages
From: ytomino <aghia05@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 14:05:08 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:17752
Date: 2013-11-21T06:05:08-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 5:14:32 AM UTC+9, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
> 
> 4.8 appears to be more buggy than 4.7. It introduced new bugs in inherited
> operations and generics (always generics). The OP could try switching back
> to 4.7 or 4.6.
> 

I tried it with gcc-4.7.2.
The result is same.