From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,325a055bed62c230 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "Mike Silva" Subject: Re: Apex vs GNAT on solaris Date: 1999/12/09 Message-ID: <5OQ34.29$ia1.6535@news.wenet.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 558613570 References: <82hiuj$74o$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <82hnll$ahu$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <384cfdb3.691883075@newsnew.draper.com> <82ku6s$jhi$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <384e52db.779218947@newsnew.draper.com> <82nhpr$g0l$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <384fa0a4.864668076@newsnew.draper.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 X-Complaints-To: news@wenet.net X-Trace: news.wenet.net 944756993 206.169.137.33 (Thu, 09 Dec 1999 08:29:53 PST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 1999 08:29:53 PST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-12-09T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Roger Racine wrote in message <384fa0a4.864668076@newsnew.draper.com>... >...I think I have made my point that I >believe there are people (like my colleagues I talked to), large in >number, who will use the default, or less, with confidence, but will >not use higher without a good reason. But surely, in the case where a mature compiler defaults to *no* optimization, nobody should think that *any* optimization is suspect in that compiler -- that's just not reasonable. Mike