From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,9f90c1cca5c28a02
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: rlove@antispam.neosoft.com (Robert B. Love )
Subject: Re: Boeing's LIDS program--Any Info??
Date: 2000/03/22
Message-ID: 
 <5CA7333B72EB8339.DC72C5A15C702646.60DB84CC8546C235@lp.airnews.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 600680476
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: 
 <89A59793797AAC7E.4AC67878C023CC71.CB8BAB246AAFDE6F@lp.airnews.net>
 <38D7FEA4.6A25F823@acm.org>
X-Orig-Message-ID: <8b9c2m$5ug@library1.airnews.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
NNTP-Posting-Time: Tue Mar 21 20:44:38 2000
Organization: Neosoft (using Airnews.net!)
NNTP-Proxy-Relay: 204.181.96.50
Mime-Version: 1.0
Abuse-Reports-To: abuse at airmail.net to report improper postings
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 2000-03-22T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In <38D7FEA4.6A25F823@acm.org> Jeff Carter wrote:
> "Robert B. Love" wrote:
> > 
> > Reading a back issue of Space News (Feb 28 2000) there is an article
> > with the headline "Boeing Delay Could Postpone NMD Deployment
> > Decision".  It goes on to say that a software program called Lead
> > Systems Integrator Distributed Systems (LIDS) is very late and it
> > is to perform the simulations that would be the basis for some
> > deployment decisions.
> 
> It's called LSI, and is completely a integration contract.
> 
> > 
> > I'm curious about the LIDS software.  Written in Ada?  Other
> > language?  Size estimates?  Real time i/f with hardware?  Is the
> > software itself distributed?  Is this using HLA?  Number of engineers
> > and which Boeing center is working it?
> 
> The software is largely in Ada, mostly Ada 83 being transitioned to Ada
> 95. The part I'm familiar with is distributed real-time simulation SW.


Well I hope Boeing gets the blame and not the language.  Are there 
any "Lessions Learned" or other commentary that Boeing has made
public?  Did they have good requirements up front or was it a "design
as you go" style project where the gaps get filled in as you proceed?

--
----------------------------------------------------------------
 Bob Love                                   
 rlove@neosoft.com                            
----------------------------------------------------------------