From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post02.iad.highwinds-media.com!fx18.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Brad Moore User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: F-22 ADA Programming References: <220f97ab-9aa2-4961-b140-2b271c3ab99a@googlegroups.com> <99759c3f-a35f-4745-a8fd-2fb6ab6fb1aa@googlegroups.com> <48dc1630-8e7d-4e29-8bdd-53d74932d9d0@googlegroups.com> <88a7f98c-55c2-4b5f-8a9d-c8b7512781c8@googlegroups.com> <50cacb19-5d0b-4dbe-b91b-0b3b462913d6@googlegroups.com> <07d0ad94-160b-4873-ba1b-403e8c0bc420@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <5BL4w.585999$FX2.191052@fx18.iad> NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.145.219.148 X-Complaints-To: internet.abuse@sjrb.ca X-Trace: 1414759873 68.145.219.148 (Fri, 31 Oct 2014 12:51:13 UTC) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 12:51:13 UTC Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 06:51:14 -0600 X-Received-Bytes: 2311 X-Received-Body-CRC: 1260249545 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:22945 Date: 2014-10-31T06:51:14-06:00 List-Id: On 2014-10-31 3:41 AM, Georg Bauhaus wrote: > To an engineer, it is obvious that no terribly broken tools should ever > be used in engineering, including bridge building, except in an > emergency. So obvious that engineers and mechanics just never face a > discussion like this: They do use a reasonably good soldering iron even > when there is a good candle, bellows and skillful use at hand. > This argument seems weak, given that there are many engineers out there who program in C++. Maybe they should be facing discussions like this, as the engineering community can have significant clout, and could influence the choice of software tools for a project, particularly if there are safety requirements involved.