From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,dbbbb21ed7f581b
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!m16g2000yqc.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: xorque <xorquewasp@googlemail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Operation can be dispatching in only one type
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 10:03:22 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <59acf311-3a4a-4eda-95a3-22272842305e@m16g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
References: 
 <025105f2-5571-400e-a66f-ef1c3dc9ef32@g27g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>
	<691d6892-bc5e-4d81-8025-c36556bf2593@13g2000prl.googlegroups.com>
	<1h9hilcg5i6il.12edpgu4szw1h.dlg@40tude.net>
 <b8b7c578-b069-43e9-bdfa-962c43a0308c@t11g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
	<1wtsriaxu0s4s$.ikwnnz5teukp$.dlg@40tude.net> <he23dv$k4c$1@munin.nbi.dk>
	<1iipp3bn16fe2.yqa1gz1ru17a$.dlg@40tude.net> <he4ls1$n2o$1@munin.nbi.dk>
	<18wh86jvjvoe0.cofxcc8udm6q$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <53a35ed9-88ac-43dc-b2a2-8d6880802328@j19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>
	<4b091fb9$0$6567$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <1w0q3zxzw79pt$.5z0juiky7kfd$.dlg@40tude.net>
	<f67ccfbf-3e78-4522-b5fd-a0d9c6088fb0@g23g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
	<yot6ojn4rhnq$.1ar1elvvs8g09.dlg@40tude.net>
 <0f177771-381e-493b-92bb-28419dfbe4e6@k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
	<1nbcfi99y0fkg.1h5ox2lj73okx$.dlg@40tude.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 78.143.202.207
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1258913003 32183 127.0.0.1 (22 Nov 2009 18:03:23
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:03:23 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: m16g2000yqc.googlegroups.com; posting-host=78.143.202.207;
	posting-account=D9GNUgoAAAAmg7CCIh9FhKHNAJmHypsp
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.0.13)
	Gecko/2009081019 Firefox/3.0.13,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:8199
Date: 2009-11-22T10:03:22-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Nov 22, 5:41=A0pm, "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mail...@dmitry-kazakov.de>
wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:52:05 -0800 (PST), xorque wrote:
>
> > I have to admit to not understanding that error.
>
> And I don't understand your design. If Archive is a Stream derive then it
> from Root_Stream_Type. If it deals with a stream then pass
> Root_Stream_Type'Class to the operations that need it.

The design is both irrelevant and obsolete. I'm just trying to find
out if
the problem is *definitely* that code so that I can close a bug in the
GCC tracker.

> But never ever return pointers to components without an urgent need.

Is it possible to save the return value of Open_Archive, or not?

Regards,
xw