From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,7acba51c7f27ee27 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Received: by 10.68.191.225 with SMTP id hb1mr8058283pbc.5.1337219415997; Wed, 16 May 2012 18:50:15 -0700 (PDT) Path: pr3ni7338pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!t2g2000pbg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Isaac Gouy Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: is having a complex type as built-in the languages vs. being in standard package makes performance difference? Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 18:48:15 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <59a93603-717d-47b6-8993-099dfb2a1f49@t2g2000pbg.googlegroups.com> References: <4fb3fea6$0$9521$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> <1099588589358896339.853580rmhost.bauhaus-maps.arcor.de@news.arcor.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.6.171.186 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: posting.google.com 1337219415 2818 127.0.0.1 (17 May 2012 01:50:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 01:50:15 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: t2g2000pbg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=24.6.171.186; posting-account=8hLxJgkAAAAL8xHLJ0ljKM_bUSuq3O6V User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/12.0,gzip(gfe) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: 2012-05-16T18:48:15-07:00 List-Id: On May 16, 2:33=A0pm, georg bauhaus wrote: > Jerry wrote: > > >>http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u64/program.php?test=3Dmandelbrot&lan= ...... > > > The third of these has no table of results. > > Jerry > > They do not always measure all programs ever submitted, in this case you > might need to run the compiler yourself ;-) "They" did (back in July 2009) but as faster programs become available, slower programs are removed.