From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM,REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,b3cc0519bd709d56,start X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.68.15.105 with SMTP id w9mr10079642pbc.7.1322192705282; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 19:45:05 -0800 (PST) Path: lh20ni15070pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "Rego, P." Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Ada Standards Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 19:32:08 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <5994234.589.1322191928216.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqli7> Reply-To: comp.lang.ada@googlegroups.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 189.110.14.179 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: posting.google.com 1322192704 26207 127.0.0.1 (25 Nov 2011 03:45:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 03:45:04 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=189.110.14.179; posting-account=TRgI1QoAAABSsYi-ox3Pi6N-JEKKU0cu User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-Google-Web-Client: true Xref: news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:19136 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: 2011-11-24T19:32:08-08:00 List-Id: How are published the new Ada Standards? I mean, when looking for some ques= tions here in forum I read some posts where some people talk (at least look= ed to me) very fluently about new features for Ada 2012 and even for Ada 20= 20, as if they were defined from long ago. I guess WG9 don't have so many p= eople or I have missed something. Ok, Adacore has just released a GNATPRO previous version which includes som= e features of Ada 2012, and reading the release notes made me learn a littl= e about these new features. AUJ and Ada Europe Conf always get some news to= o and I also read the John Barnes introduction for the Ada 2012 rationale. = But sometimes I cannot distinguish if people talk about suggested/desired f= eatures (as if they were to be implemented) or if they talk about decided/p= ublished features by WG9/ISO. Maybe is there a draft of ARM2012 available?