From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a3ca574fc2007430
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: geert@fozzie.sun3.iaf.nl (Geert Bosch)
Subject: Re: Ada and Automotive Industry
Date: 1996/12/18
Message-ID: <597etq$cua@fozzie.sun3.iaf.nl>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 204681509
references: <mazzanti-0512961053010001@131.114.200.115>
 <EACHUS.96Dec10195317@spectre.mitre.org>
 <32B197A6.2781E494@escmail.orl.lmco.com> <dewar.850626633@merv>
organization: La Calandre Infortunee
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-12-18T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Robert Dewar (dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu) wrote:

   "Hmmm. Can I take this to mean that it is not a good idea to raise
   predefined exceptions manually? Are predefined exceptions somehow
   handled differently than user-defined ones?"

   Yes, see RM 11.6

RM 11.6 says nothing about raising language-defined exceptions.
It only specifies the behavior of language-defined *checks*.
I don't see why predefined exceptions are handled differently 
than user-defined ones.

   Geert
-- 
E-Mail: geert@sun3.iaf.nl : Die Windows is hartstikke vaag man, daar moeten 
                          : we een glazenwasser bij halen! (Meneer Jos)