From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE,
	MSGID_SHORT,REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.4
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!ucla-cs!zen!ucbvax!decvax!decwrl!sun!pitstop!sundc!seismo!uunet!mcvax!cernvax!paul
From: paul@cernvax.UUCP (paul)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: A Bug in VAX Ada (ACCVIO)
Summary: Is it really erroneous or not?
Message-ID: <596@cernvax.UUCP>
Date: 11 Jan 88 09:01:39 GMT
References: <1988.1.8.20.3.20.Alfred.Peterson@sei.cmu.edu>
Reply-To: paul@cernvax.UUCP ()
Organization: CERN European Laboratory for Particle Physics, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Seems odd to me that it should be legal to optimise an otherwise good
program (in my opinion) into one that doesn't work any more.

Does anyone else think the program is erroneous?

Paul