From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,703c4f68db81387d X-Google-Thread: 109fba,703c4f68db81387d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,gid109fba,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsmi-us.news.garr.it!newsmi-eu.news.garr.it!NewsITBone-GARR!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Vinzent 'Gadget' Hoefler Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c++ Subject: Re: Teaching new tricks to an old dog (C++ -->Ada) Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 12:50:04 +0000 Message-ID: <5915236.EF8OCIUhJR@jellix.jlfencey.com> References: <4229bad9$0$1019$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <1110032222.447846.167060@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <871xau9nlh.fsf@insalien.org> <3SjWd.103128$Vf.3969241@news000.worldonline.dk> <87r7iu85lf.fsf@insalien.org> <1110052142.832650@athnrd02> <1110284070.410136.205090@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com> <395uqaF5rhu2mU1@individual.net> <1110329098.642196@athnrd02> <1110361741.551255@athnrd02> <422edaec$0$26554$9b4e6d93@newsread4.arcor-online.net> <1111464133.508323@athnrd02> <423fe9df$0$11476$9b4e6d93@newsread2.arcor-online.net> <1111521825.653841@athnrd02> <424094b0$0$11481$9b4e6d93@newsread2.arcor-online.net> <1111568404.687226@athnrd02> <3afmc2F6b3mooU1@individual.net> <1111665309.881405@athnrd02> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Trace: individual.net IupDqcvgMMJ4+ikYQocnbAAF90elSmAJO38gDbgj0RQ2Klu0hn X-Phone: +41 62 961 13 52 X-Mood: Beautiful day to take over the world. Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:9903 comp.lang.c++:47061 Date: 2005-03-24T12:50:04+00:00 List-Id: Ioannis Vranos wrote: > I have to say that for simple cases of things like that - in case we > want to associate the x ranges with the y values - in C++ we "keep in > mind" that [0] is for -5, etc, in the style: [...] > It isn't that incomprehensible if you are used to programming in C++. Of course it's not "incomprehensible", for me it's inconvinient. Once I actually got used to range types (these days I use them heavily, although not so often with negative indices) it appears to me that I sometimes just get confused when everything starts at zero, because then I always have to keep in mind where and how a real world range is biased. This distracts me from the original problem I am trying to solve. Vinzent. -- worst case: The wrong assumption there actually is one.