From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fac41,b87849933931bc93
X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,b87849933931bc93
X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public
X-Google-Thread: 11cae8,b87849933931bc93
X-Google-Attributes: gid11cae8,public
X-Google-Thread: f43e6,b87849933931bc93
X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public
X-Google-Thread: 114809,b87849933931bc93
X-Google-Attributes: gid114809,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b87849933931bc93
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,b87849933931bc93
X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public
From: schwarza@gdls.com (Art Schwarz)
Subject: Re: What is wrong with OO ?
Date: 1996/12/10
Message-ID: <58js0q$lri@mill.gdls.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 203329815
references: <32A7ACD0.620D@ix.netcom.com>
organization: General Dynamics, Land Systems Div
reply-to: schwarza@gdls.com
newsgroups: 
 comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.smalltalk,comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.ada,comp.lnag.java,comp.object,comp.software-eng
Date: 1996-12-10T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>



!> People who have been a part of varied programming teams have often
!> learned that good programmers program well in any language.  Bad
!> programmers program poorly in any language.

And the same applies to 'designers' and 'design methodologies'. Too
often a good design methodology is condemned by a bad design and a
bad design methodology is advanced by a good design.