From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109fba,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: fac41,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public X-Google-Thread: 11cae8,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gid11cae8,public X-Google-Thread: f43e6,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public X-Google-Thread: 114809,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gid114809,public From: bgridle@dwave.net (Brian Gridley) Subject: Re: What is wrong with OO ? Date: 1996/12/05 Message-ID: <585q57$nau@blackice.winternet.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 202454275 references: <585fep$ero@news3.digex.net> content-type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII organization: DataWave Technologies mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.smalltalk,comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.ada,comp.lnag.java,comp.object,comp.software-eng Date: 1996-12-05T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: >: > Every programmer is tackling the same problem using his own perception >: > of the problem..his own abstraction.. > >: Yes, and the alternative is?... > Communication, teams, and a development environment 2 steps beyond ENVY. If all the code that has been written in various shops became available to the general developing public within 3 months of it's creation, we would have spent far less time repeating ourselves, and have the most robust development environment and reuseable code, and have eliminated all other language competitors (not ST-based). Instead, we are still all solving the same problems , over and over again. Is anyone interested in building a communal repository with a system for charging users and rewarding developers for code?