From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE, MSGID_SHORT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,7c03c726bce5bdb X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-03-09 20:02:16 PST Path: sparky!uunet!utcsri!newsflash.concordia.ca!daily-planet.concordia.ca!victor From: victor@cs.concordia.ca (KRAWCZUK victor) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Does DECada 1.1 really use POSIX 1003 draft 4 threads... Keywords: P1003.4 Message-ID: <5827@daily-planet.concordia.ca> Date: 10 Mar 93 00:31:43 GMT References: <1993Feb22.155128.28080@nntpd2.cxo.dec.com> Sender: usenet@daily-planet.concordia.ca Distribution: comp Organization: Computer Science, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec Date: 1993-03-10T00:31:43+00:00 List-Id: In article emery@goldfinger.mitre.org (David Emery) writes: >These POSIX blocking behaviors are defined in P1003.5, and are >independent of the use of POSIX.4a threads. (They can be supported >via threads, or any other implementation technique.) > BTW Dave, I think I read somewhere that P1003.5 will be changed to incorporate P1003.4 (real-time extensions) into an Ada mold (P1003.5). Is this true? If yes, what's the timeframe? Should I hold my breath waiting for this new version of P1003.5, or should I reluctantly start making my own "hack" P1003.4 Ada bindings ;-). -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- | Victor Krawczuk (e-mail : victor@cs.concordia.ca ) | | Concordia University, Dept. of Computer Science (H-961) | | 1455 De Maisonneuve Blvd. W., Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3G 1M8 |