From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10eb76,c80861c7209231ac X-Google-Attributes: gid10eb76,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,c80861c7209231ac X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 114917,c80861c7209231ac X-Google-Attributes: gid114917,public From: ccrayne@pacific.net Subject: Re: Number of postings to comp.lang.* newsgroups. Date: 1996/12/03 Message-ID: <5823dg$l6r@north.pacific.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 202156944 references: <56ti81$e0u@pea.csc.calpoly.edu> <32935F3C.17F8@sn.no> <57uku7$7je@srv13s4.cas.org> organization: Crayne Consulting reply-to: ccrayne@pacific.net newsgroups: comp.lang.tcl,comp.lang.asm.x86,comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-12-03T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In <57uku7$7je@srv13s4.cas.org>, lwv26@cas.org (Larry W. Virden) writes: #Here's another interesting note - the msg being quoted here happens to be #message 51,660 on my system; which means the number of posts listed are #off by almost 50% ! Here's another interesting note - the msg being quoted here happens to be message 26,102 on my system; which means the number of posts has nothing whatsoever to do with the message number provided by my ISP. -- Chuck