From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,abd120a1d5231d28
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: lga@sma.ch (Laurent Gasser)
Subject: Re: Looking for a good Ada 95 book
Date: 1996/12/02
Message-ID: <57ul1oINNkae@maz4.sma.ch>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 201869487
distribution: world
references: <57noj5$j8e$1@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au>
organization: Swiss Meteorological Institute
reply-to: lga@sma.ch
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-12-02T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <57noj5$j8e$1@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au>, Dale Stanbrough <dale@goanna.cs.rmit.EDU.AU> writes:
> Jim Carr writes:
>  
>  "Has anyone experimented with a series of projects where a student is 
>  required to use a routine from project N-1 that was written by another 
>  student, to emphasize the need for clarity and documentation?"
>
... 
> Also on giving them work from other students... what if the work is
> fundamentally flawed? How do you assess what they have done? Students 
> don't like being penalised because of the failings of other students.
> 
> Dale

Is this possible to distribute only the works with a certain level of
quality.  Something like not every copy returned to the teacher, but
works which were rated A-B, no less.  Or for each student, a set of
three works from which to choose, with motivated rationals for the
selected version.

-- 
Laurent Gasser (lga@sma.ch)
Computers do not solve problems, they execute solutions.