From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,ea40456edaea3d23 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: mfeldman@seas.gwu.edu (Michael Feldman) Subject: Re: Pascal to Ada translator/ aflex,ayacc GNAT ports Date: 1996/12/01 Message-ID: <57smqe$ajr@felix.seas.gwu.edu>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 201748195 references: <57htn2$jm8@cnn.Princeton.EDU> <01bbde93$a09ea190$0d208b82@wd> <01bbdf5d$da19d820$33208b82@wd> organization: George Washington University newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-12-01T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <01bbdf5d$da19d820$33208b82@wd>, wiljan wrote: >My intermediate goal was the translator, but my final goal was to >have my EPASCAL code running in Ada on Windows NT. > >Wiljan I agree with Wiljan here - a partial translation - to be completed and cleaned up by hand - is better than none at all. I've done a lot of ad-hoc partial translations of Pascal and Modula-2 code, mostly using very simple stuff written in SNOBOL. This code has all been significantly improved by hand, but the job was _much_ easier than hand-coding from scratch. As in so many other things, I think moderation is a virtue here. Mike Feldman