From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!cca!mirror!ishmael!ada-uts!stt
From: stt@ada-uts
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: exporting "=" problem, Dec-Alsys co
Message-ID: <57900055@ada-uts>
Date: Tue, 1-Dec-87 11:42:00 EST
Article-I.D.: ada-uts.57900055
Posted: Tue Dec  1 11:42:00 1987
Date-Received: Wed, 9-Dec-87 02:32:10 EST
References: <26132@ajpo.sei.cmu.edu>
Nf-ID: #R:ajpo.sei.cmu.edu:-2613200:ada-uts:57900055:000:486
Nf-From: ada-uts!stt    Dec  1 11:42:00 1987
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Your Ada is correct from my viewpoint, and
our compiler likes it too.

One question, though, is why is your Operators sub-package generic?
Couldn't you use the same trick without making the sub-package generic,
meaning you would just "use STRINGS.OPERATORS;" rather than
having to instantiate it, "with" it, and then "use" it?

S. Tucker Taft
Intermetrics, Inc.
Cambridge, MA  02138

P.S. it was our UTS-hosted Ada compiler
version 202.09 which compiled your code without
complaint. -T