From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,9101a0ae34d9487f
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Received: by 10.68.231.138 with SMTP id tg10mr5017069pbc.7.1332085451893;
        Sun, 18 Mar 2012 08:44:11 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 h9ni46135pbe.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Manuel Gomez <mgrojo@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: AdaRocks.com
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 08:44:11 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <5712169.1100.1332085451295.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbas10>
References: <jk2s24$nr0$1@munin.nbi.dk> <op.wbc4cyvrule2fv@douda-yannick>
 <32680008.0.1332070689781.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbtf26>
 <op.wbc72lemule2fv@douda-yannick>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 87.216.104.196
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1332085451 5757 127.0.0.1 (18 Mar 2012 15:44:11
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 15:44:11 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <op.wbc72lemule2fv@douda-yannick>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=87.216.104.196;
 posting-account=wH6HYAoAAAAK7zncUBGPTSTVRKG7WqMb
User-Agent: G2/1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: 2012-03-18T08:44:11-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

El domingo 18 de marzo de 2012 13:09:47 UTC+1, Hibou57 (Yannick Duch=EAne) =
 escribi=F3:
> Le Sun, 18 Mar 2012 12:38:09 +0100, Manuel Gomez a =20
> =E9crit:
> > By the way, it's nice to see a new Ada site on the Internet, but I thin=
k =20
> > the Ada community should collaborate more on communal web sites rather =
=20
> > than individual-effort sites.
> I don't agree with that belief. We already have references sites. And =20
> communal web sites need not be big or kind of monopolistic sites. There =
=20
> may be as much site as there are people sufficiently involved, each =20
> exposing some point of view and experiences. Trying to federate too much =
=20
> may break consistency, just like you may break some style and design rule=
s =20
> when you build an application from too much varying in style and design =
=20
> piece of libraries or already existing software. Individual web sites has=
 =20
> values due to their nature and do not prevent bigger and more =20
> collaborative sites, at least because authors of tiny and personal sites =
=20
> can belong to communal and collaborative sites (or Usenet groups).

Don't get me wrong. I enjoy every new site devoted to Ada. What sometimes b=
others me is the abandonment of sites just because the only one maintainer =
looses interest, which is also legitimate. Therefore I think that more coll=
aborative approaches are useful, because there is always someone who can co=
ntinue the effort. By the way, I see there are two authors collaborating in=
 adarocks.com according to the post list [1]. That is good.=20

[1]: http://adarocks.com/tracker2