From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,6609c40f81b32989
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: 1094ba,9bdec20bcc7f3687
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: 101deb,e67cdb1dcad3c668
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: 
 gida07f3367d7,gid8d3408f8c3,gidbda4de328f,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!npeer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.wiretrip.org!news.dizum.com!sewer-output!mail2news-x3!mail2news-x2!mail2news
From: "Non scrivetemi" <nonscrivetemi@pboxmix.winstonsmith.info>
Message: This is a Type II anonymous message, sent to you by the Winston Smith
         Project Pboxmix mixmaster server at pboxmix.winstonsmith.info.
         If you do not want to receive anonymous messages, please contact
         pbox-admin@winstonsmith.info.
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.fortran,comp.lang.pl1
Subject: Re: Why is Ada considered "too specialized" for scientific use
References: <nospam-C84D27.10531806062010@earthlink.us.supernews.com>
Message-ID: <570d1fbf63147dd5c651480149fffbf9@pboxmix.winstonsmith.info>
Date: Sun,  6 Jun 2010 20:33:33 +0200 (CEST)
Mail-To-News-Contact: abuse@dizum.com
Organization: mail2news@dizum.com
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:12342 comp.lang.fortran:26394
 comp.lang.pl1:1492
Date: 2010-06-06T20:33:33+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Arthur Evans  Jr <nospam@someISP.net> wrote:

> In article <4c0b234f$1$fuzhry+tra$mr2ice@news.patriot.net>,
>  Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz <spamtrap@library.lspace.org.invalid> wrote:
> 
> >       The last time you cited something that you claimed to have
> > been written in machine language it turned out to have been written in
> > assembler.
> 
> As one who was writing programs in 1957, I can assure you that the two 
> terms were then used interchangeably.
> 
> Art Evans
> Old Codger

I don't know what happened up to that point, but I can assure you that the
two terms were not used interchangably after 1957. Assembler is *not*
machine language.