From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fac41,dad65365cb2b3396 X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public X-Google-Thread: 109fba,dad65365cb2b3396 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 1014db,dad65365cb2b3396 X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public X-Google-Thread: 106c43,dad65365cb2b3396 X-Google-Attributes: gid106c43,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,dad65365cb2b3396 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: kaz@vision.crest.nt.com (Kaz Kylheku) Subject: Re: The disturbing myth of Eiffel portability Date: 1996/11/20 Message-ID: <56vouc$k3b@bcrkh13.bnr.ca>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 197704466 references: <3294e64b.74799475@news2.ibm.net> <56t1m4$nis@bcrkh13.bnr.ca> <3292D290.51F7@wgold.demon.co.uk> organization: Prism Systems Inc. newsgroups: comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.object Date: 1996-11-20T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <3292D290.51F7@wgold.demon.co.uk>, James Mansion wrote: >Kaz Kylheku wrote: > >> What fool would use floating point numbers for a banking system in the first >> place? Floating point numbers are not well suited for representing currency, >> except if their extra mantissa bits allow you to use them as ``large >> integers''. > >Hmm, what fool would make a statement like this without any >understanding of >derivatives trading? ;-) Yes, I took a risk there. The only derivatives I know are in the domain of elementary calculus, and few are interested in trading those! :)