From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,a3ca574fc2007430 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 115aec,f41f1f25333fa601 X-Google-Attributes: gid115aec,public From: wmilam@ford.com (William P. Milam) Subject: Re: Ada and Automotive Industry Date: 1996/11/15 Message-ID: <56ig0f$201@fmsrlw.srl.ford.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 196714502 references: <55ea3g$m1j@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <3280DA96.15FB@hso.link.com> organization: Ford Research Laboratory newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.realtime Date: 1996-11-15T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , eachus@spectre.mitre.org says... > Having said that, if given a choice would I target the 8051 or the >Z80? Z80 I think. What about the 68HC11? Any other reasonable >choices? > How many Z80's are sold for embedded automotive use? Zero! 68HC11 is used by many manufacturers. -- ************************************************ * * * All opinions herein expressed are mine and * * mine alone. You may choose to ignore them * * but I own them. Heck, my kids don't listen * * to me, why should you? * * * * Email: wmilam@ford.com * ************************************************