From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,23c0de5a42cf667e
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,CP1252
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!a21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Phil Thornley <phil.jpthornley@googlemail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GNAT packages in Linux distributions
Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 01:05:28 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <56b51f21-8daa-4c53-a57a-f57b3945f116@a21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>
References: <j5e1x31qvn1b$.11ywrjmshtauz$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <87mxw9x7no.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org>
	<t8liq7w6ffnm$.19yq5hkq6tdto$.dlg@40tude.net> <op.vcgi9oqzule2fv@garhos>
	<w1q9e75h9kzi.4p81vh3kannn$.dlg@40tude.net> <op.vch6dsqmxmjfy8@garhos>
	<16bz9kvbqa8y9$.155ntpwpwl29d.dlg@40tude.net>
 <4be97bea$0$2966$ba4acef3@reader.news.orange.fr>
	<op.vcjtnsp5xmjfy8@garhos> <quqkqeas8pu2$.1w5pelct29juv.dlg@40tude.net>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.1005121017020.21749@medsec1.medien.uni-weimar.de>
	<op.vclkx5gexmjfy8@garhos>
 <4ebd36b8-ea2f-4879-aee6-2ac23a92ffc9@b7g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>
	<op.vclqdfsnule2fv@garhos>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 80.177.171.182
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1273737928 19763 127.0.0.1 (13 May 2010 08:05:28
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 08:05:28 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: a21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com; posting-host=80.177.171.182;
	posting-account=Fz1-yAoAAACc1SDCr-Py2qBj8xQ-qC2q
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
	Trident/4.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR
	3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:11580
Date: 2010-05-13T01:05:28-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 12 May, 17:49, Yannick Duch=EAne (Hibou57) <yannick_duch...@yahoo.fr>
wrote:
> ... The =93process=94 was reloading its previous state from =A0
> variables each time it was resuming, and as there was obviously no way to=
 =A0
> restore the stack pointer (JavaScript is not C or assembly you know), I =
=A0
> had to re-implement the stack this way.
>
> I suppose this kind of recursivity would be OK.

Sure - you can make the data structures as complicated as you like -
the recursion rules in SPARK only apply to the code structures.

Cheers,

Phil