From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,81bb2ce65a3240c3
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Received: by 10.50.203.103 with SMTP id kp7mr17728647igc.2.1342083658195;
        Thu, 12 Jul 2012 02:00:58 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 l9ni11515pbj.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Egil_H=F8vik?= <egilhovik@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: What would you like in Ada202X?
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 02:00:57 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <569c077e-3703-42de-a98f-dc29774fc3c0@googlegroups.com>
References: <3637793.35.1335340026327.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynfi5>
 <a0nvb0Fem2U1@mid.individual.net>
 <4ff312ad$0$6178$ba4acef3@reader.news.orange.fr>
 <4ff314d8$0$6218$ba4acef3@reader.news.orange.fr>
 <856acffb-1fc3-474e-b11f-f540977e945f@googlegroups.com>
 <jt1d0o$vn9$1@speranza.aioe.org> <m2fw97xvf8.fsf@pushface.org>
 <0o59v7djiffnl7sqdpp2uiso78oa9hb8sb@invalid.netcom.com>
 <be781272-bff6-42c4-9116-0af7393dac48@googlegroups.com>
 <m2bojvxivm.fsf@pushface.org>
 <aa178faa-552e-4bc7-8560-aac072b8cde6@googlegroups.com>
 <m2ipe2w3h3.fsf@pushface.org>
 <caa383c2-98ea-417c-a2e2-1c9aac9bdfd0@googlegroups.com>
 <m2a9zcx60f.fsf@pushface.org>
 <d6a04da0-cd42-4175-bbdb-5190788e6598@googlegroups.com>
 <m2wr29xtzb.fsf@nidhoggr.home>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.71.180.107
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1342083658 20780 127.0.0.1 (12 Jul 2012 09:00:58
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 09:00:58 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <m2wr29xtzb.fsf@nidhoggr.home>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=193.71.180.107;
 posting-account=P68zsgoAAABKpXKMUuwuUZ_RfBk1kZfB
User-Agent: G2/1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: 2012-07-12T02:00:57-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Thursday, July 12, 2012 10:29:44 AM UTC+2, Simon Wright wrote:
> Egil H=F8vik writes:
>=20
> &gt; There&#39;s also the fact that the BLAS/LAPACK libraries used by Ada=
Core
> &gt; in previous versions were C code generated from very old Fortran,
> &gt; where stack variables didn&#39;t exist, thus the C code is littered =
with
> &gt; static variables, which means a ton of issues with multithreading, a=
nd
> &gt; is a violation of RM A(3)
>=20
> Good point!
>=20
> What&#39;s the threading position with current BLAS/LAPACK?

I wouldn't know, but I expect the highly optimized Intel- and AMD-versions
to be thread-safe as they are probably coded from scratch

--=20
~egilhh