From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,6deb3e1ddefb099
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.195.131 with SMTP id ie3mr15060351pbc.8.1337367594337;
        Fri, 18 May 2012 11:59:54 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 pr3ni2150pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Shark8 <onewingedshark@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Companies Only Offering Ada-95 Compilers
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 11:53:31 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <56984a74-6918-4ad7-8209-0b11df93008f@googlegroups.com>
References: <jp1k2n$ouo$1@adenine.netfront.net> <jp4ih4$srv$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <jp4q52$c0d$1@adenine.netfront.net> <wcc396xip49.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 96.2.54.122
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1337367594 28837 127.0.0.1 (18 May 2012 18:59:54
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 18:59:54 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <wcc396xip49.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=96.2.54.122;
 posting-account=lJ3JNwoAAAAQfH3VV9vttJLkThaxtTfC
User-Agent: G2/1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Date: 2012-05-18T11:53:31-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Friday, May 18, 2012 8:40:38 AM UTC-5, Robert A Duff wrote:
> Jeffrey Carter <spam.jrcarter.not@spam.not.acm.org> writes:
> > So to recap, of 7 compilers, 3 implement the complete current standard
> > (1 of them also implements the draft standard for the next version). 5
> > years after publication of the standard, that's not very encouraging.
> 
> Why do you say so?  It's much better than the situation in the C world.
> 
> - Bob

Could you elaborate on that? (What is the situation in the C/C++ world?)