From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,1116ece181be1aea X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-09-11 10:25:37 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: hyrosen@mail.com (Hyman Rosen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Is the Writing on the Wall for Ada? Date: 11 Sep 2003 10:25:35 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <568ede3c.0309110925.57d07508@posting.google.com> References: <3F5F7FDC.30500@attbi.com> <3F6079A9.6080108@attbi.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.253.248.214 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1063301137 2186 127.0.0.1 (11 Sep 2003 17:25:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 11 Sep 2003 17:25:37 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:42385 Date: 2003-09-11T17:25:37+00:00 List-Id: "Robert I. Eachus" wrote in message news:<3F6079A9.6080108@attbi.com>... > Let me follow through on that, since you didn't seem to get it. What's to get? You are demonstrating one case where MI is not appropriate, and you seem to think that this constitues a proof that MI is never appropriate. Socrates is a man. Therefore all men are Socrates.