From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,59f7ca851a394aa3 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: smccoy@hisd.harris.com (Scott McCoy) Subject: Re: Reasons NOT To Choose Ada Date: 1996/11/11 Message-ID: <568bor$ob9@su102w.ess.harris.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 195859866 sender: smccoy@dr3w (Cheshire Cat) references: <32872161.19FE@eurocontrol.fr> content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii organization: Harris Corp. Information Systems Division mime-version: 1.0 reply-to: smccoy@hisd.harris.com newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-11-11T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <32872161.19FE@eurocontrol.fr>, Steve Jones - JON writes: |> |> 6. There is no VisualAda or Borland Ada. Most Ada compilers are |> still rather poor. They tell you what the problem is in the same |> way a C compiler does. |> There is (or was) a VisualAda product. Was pretty good, too. I'm afraid I haven't kept up with it or the company that made it, but I was very happy with the tool when I did. I especially liked building rapid prototypes with it, because I found I didn't have to throw away as much of the prototype app as I did with other languages. -- Scott McCoy Harris Information Systems Division