From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fac41,e0a59694a441eb7b X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,e0a59694a441eb7b X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public X-Google-Thread: 109fba,e0a59694a441eb7b X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,e0a59694a441eb7b X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-04-18 18:53:54 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: eventhelix@hotmail.com (EventHelix.com) Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.eiffel,comp.object Subject: Re: OOP Language for OS Development Date: 18 Apr 2004 18:53:53 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <566e2bfb.0404181753.2844342f@posting.google.com> References: <95db0572.0404142153.431fd058@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.82.9.31 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1082339634 22316 127.0.0.1 (19 Apr 2004 01:53:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 01:53:54 +0000 (UTC) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.c++:30352 comp.lang.ada:7321 comp.lang.eiffel:687 comp.object:10830 Date: 2004-04-18T18:53:53-07:00 List-Id: > 2) Which OOP language would be better for OS development? At this point C++ would seem to be the best choice. I don't think any other language would match C++ in performance and power. Besides, many operating systems have already been written in C++. Sandeep -- http://www.EventHelix.com/EventStudio EventStudio 2.0 - System Architecture Design CASE Tool