From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,808505c9db7d5613
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: mfeldman@seas.gwu.edu (Michael Feldman)
Subject: Re: Looking for good Ada95 book
Date: 1996/11/09
Message-ID: <563ja7$jpe@felix.seas.gwu.edu>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 195603296
references: <32723F6A.54A3@dtek.chalmers.se> <dewar.846952540@merv>
 <327E3E4D.5107@watson.ibm.com> <327EA5BB.1EFD@gate.net>
organization: George Washington University
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-11-09T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <327EA5BB.1EFD@gate.net>, Jerry Petrey  <gpetrey@gate.net> wrote:

[snip]

>In any case, I think Feldman's book is still a very good book for
>its intended audience, in spite of this difference in style.
>Other great books are: Norman's "Ada 95 as a Second Language",
>Naiditch's "Rendezvous with Ada 95", Smith's "O-O Software in Ada 95"
>and, of course, Barnes' "Programming in Ada 95".

I agree with you about all these books; each has its intended audience.
I'm delighted to run into someone who actually seems to be reading for
content, instead of trashing a book for a supposed "rear guard" against
a consensus lexical style.

Thanks for the support.

Mike Feldman