From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.snarked.org!us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Bill Findlay Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: A way to do a huge Ada promotion Date: 27 May 2014 15:38:48 GMT Message-ID: <561766127422896959.174173yaldnif.w-blueyonder.co.uk@news.individual.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net HuumaRCxJFUQEX5evHy08gno4l3ntuP1sQb3Xdw/PMVwy0ZoDY Cancel-Lock: sha1:gqQr5uFQveg8bEPxkfMOQ9nCoxo= User-Agent: NewsTap/4.0.1 (iPad) Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:186657 Date: 2014-05-27T15:38:48+00:00 List-Id: Victor Porton wrote: > Bill Findlay wrote: > >> On 27/05/2014 13:50, in article lm21nc$4fj$1@speranza.aioe.org, "Victor >> Porton" wrote: >> >>> Just to clarify: There are no direct links between my sites about >>> different topics. There are only links to/from my homepage to/from every >>> my topical site. >> >> You are contradicting yourself (to put it kindly). >> >> On http://portonvictor.org you offer these links: >> >>> My math blog >>> My software/programming blog >>> My religious blog >> >> The third directly leads to a page containing this: >> >> "Homosexuality is certainly a sin or a pathology." >> >> Attitudes like this are a mortal danger to millions around the world, >> subject to the risks of oppression, lynching and even judicial murder. >> >> By fostering such attitudes you help to increase that risk. >> >> I will not accept your using comp.lang.ada for that purpose. > > Wrong. I do not support economical discrimination of LGBT. Changing the subject is very much your favourite mode of argument, is it not? I take it that is because you do not have an adequate reply that is relevant. -- Bill Findlay