From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,587e0e0a16d65b10 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!w34g2000yqm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hibou57_=28Yannick_Duch=EAne=29?= Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Invade wikipedia! Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:31:08 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <560f7212-8758-4555-9613-94d45512b2db@w34g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> References: <1tw8gryqdolal$.1osqedj9x821c.dlg@40tude.net> <5c44eaae-631d-46d2-8384-86af79d5e048@n20g2000vba.googlegroups.com> <944a1924-0fa7-487f-a94d-084a2be1b231@v31g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <9f2553d3-66f5-4708-a237-bfef1d8404f4@v42g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> <4013d6a4-f4f4-4d6e-92bd-161687608db9@w9g2000yqa.googlegroups.com> <49a58a60$0$30235$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> <49a599ac$0$30225$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.75.149.247 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1235802668 4116 127.0.0.1 (28 Feb 2009 06:31:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 06:31:08 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: w34g2000yqm.googlegroups.com; posting-host=86.75.149.247; posting-account=vrfdLAoAAAAauX_3XwyXEwXCWN3A1l8D User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; fr),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:4812 Date: 2009-02-27T22:31:08-08:00 List-Id: On 28 f=E9v, 00:53, "Randy Brukardt" wrote: > Actually, it is easier to see that thread by looking in AI05-0145-1 and > AI05-0146-1. But a word of warning: we've changed those proposals a lot > based on the discussions at last week's ARG meeting. So you may want to w= ait > for the minutes of that meeting and the revised proposals (whenever they'= ll > be done) before commenting on them. (In fact, I suspect we'd all apprecia= te > it if you did that, because repeating previous discussions is no fun...) > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Randy. I've just looked at the "pragma postcondition" and etc. Exactly the same when we were talking about Eiffel pre/post conditions. So it is planed for Ada 2015 ? By the way, I've seen a "It's BAAACCKK!!: In Out parameters for functions" not far from there