From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b1ca6b20e2e91f67,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: pontius@btv.ibm.com (Dale Pontius)
Subject: OS/2 GNAT emx 0.9C
Date: 1996/11/07
Message-ID: <55t2sj$1b5e@mdnews.btv.ibm.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 195104342
organization: IBM Microelectronics Division
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-11-07T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Has this combination been tested? I know GNAT 3.05 was built
using emx 0.9b, but there are now packages out there (XFree86/2
being the one that comes to mind.) that require emx 0.9c fix1.
(I'm under the impression that emx 0.9c breaks things without
fix1.)

Has someone tried this, or am I going to have to be the pioneer?

Thanks,
Dale Pontius
(NOT speaking for IBM)