From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: ff6c8,37e6dbf5e31f6da0
X-Google-Attributes: gidff6c8,public
X-Google-Thread: f43e6,37e6dbf5e31f6da0
X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,37e6dbf5e31f6da0
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: 10db24,37e6dbf5e31f6da0
X-Google-Attributes: gid10db24,public
X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,37e6dbf5e31f6da0
X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public
From: adam@irvine.com (Adam Beneschan)
Subject: Re: Software Engineering News Brief
Date: 1996/11/01
Message-ID: <55e02f$oq0@krusty.irvine.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 193814414
references: <55dr50$ch1@ns1.sw-eng.falls-church.va.us>
organization: /z/news/newsctl/organization
newsgroups: 
 comp.lang.ada,comp.sw.components,comp.object,comp.software-eng,comp.edu
Date: 1996-11-01T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


seic@sw-eng.falls-church.va.us (Software Engineering News) writes:

 >*******************************
 >YEAR 2000  NO PROBLEM FOR ADA
 >
 >Ada developers who've been scorned by the C/C++ camp might be laughing 
 >all the way to the year 2000.
 >
 >Ada applications aren't likely to fail any time between now and January 1, 
 >2000, or beyond, for the simple reason that Ada doesn't let programmers 
 >represent dates in two-digit shorthand.
 >
 >"There's no problem with Ada," said Jacques Brygier, marketing director 
 >for Thompson Software Products.  "The language has been defined in a way 
 >that you cannot make this kind of mistake."  
 >
 >According to Dr. Charles Engle, chief of the Ada Joint Program Office, the 
 >Ada language itself has built-in dates from 1901 to 2099, thus eliminating 
 >the 2000 problem.
 >
 >TOPIC: ADA
 >
 >SOURCE:  Olsen, Florence.  "Ada sails smoothly into 2000," Government 
 >Computer News v15(25), Oct. 7, 1996, p. 33.  
 >
 >*************************************

Ada has a number of advantages over other languages, so I hope no one
trying to advocate the language resorts to a lame reason like this
one.  The Year 2000 problem is a software design issue, not a language
issue.  I think that programmers in recent years have been aware that
the millenium is looming, more than they were 25-30 years ago, so any
program designed these days will take the year 2000 into account.
Sure, other languages like C don't have standard library routines to
handle dates defined in the language definition, but it's no problem
to put your own together.  So I don't see how Year 2000 issues give us
any particular reason to crow about Ada.  (Or to insult C/C++ in the
process.  I'm willing to bet that the vast majority of programs with a
Year 2000 problem are COBOL, RPG, or other older languages, not C and
definitely not C++.)

                                -- Adam